Lite is free. Pro adds this and the rest of the quality layer.
A reviewer thatdid not write it.
Adams gives your change to a separate agent, ranks what it finds and offers fixes only when you say yes.
Pro
// the problem
What goes wrong
The author grades its own workAn AI that wrote the code will tell you it works. It is the least likely to see its own blind spot.
Reviews arrive as a wall of notesFifty remarks of equal weight bury the one that matters. You skim, and miss the real one.
// what adams does
What Adams does
Separates author and reviewerThe review runs in a different agent from the one that wrote the change, and the author cannot sign off on itself.
Ranks by severityFindings are ordered so a leaked secret sits above a style note.
Fixes only on yesYou are asked once whether to fix. The reviewer then looks at the fixed items again.
// worked example
An example
Reviewing a change
Illustrative session.
~/project~/your-project · example
/adams:review
What to review: the code change (recommended)
P1: no check that the user owns this order
P3: rename one helper
Fix these findings? Yes (recommended)
// faq
Questions
Does it change my code on its own?
No. It asks, and fixes only after a yes.
Is it a replacement for human review?
No. It is an extra pass before one. Use both on work that matters.
Is it Pro?
Yes.
// related